User talk:0x0a

Archives

2020 - 2022,

2023, 2024

Copyright status: File:Houston, Texas Skyline 2017.jpg

Copyright status: File:Houston, Texas Skyline 2017.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Houston, Texas Skyline 2017.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buddha statue 525883.jpg

File:Buddha statue 525883.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 23:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of User:Dvp777

Hi, I have noticed that you marked a file upload of this user as suspicous. I would guess that all of his uploads are copyright violations, since the user often removes all sources / EXIF etc. Would it make sense to generate a check on this user? Xgeorg (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Xgeorg Yes. I have reported this matter at COM:ANU. I actually don't know how many of them are not his own photos. If he refuses to reveal it, we will have to delete all the photos without metadata. 0x0a (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Here is another candidate: User:Rickard Elofsson and User:Rob j. Smith Photos (seems to be a sockpuppet). Xgeorg (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am not related to Rob j. Smith but I was on a phone call with him not to long ago to guide him through the steps of uploading his own works. Previously I contacted many of Marx Noren's photographer as I wanted to create a category/ Gallery for Marx Norén and all of his hockey photos. I uploaded them and further I reached out to the photographers/ authors of the works so that they could confirm their works. Yet suddenly the pictures were all removed.

So now, I wanted to guide who I previously contacted to confirm their works with a mail to personally upload their works themselves because they were struggling to confirm their works via mail.

I am simply here on wikimedia commons to contribute my pictures, and really do not want to cause any harm and want to do this the right way, always. I have taken many images of Kevin Marx Noren myself with the hockey team. I really hope you too, understand that I am the sole photographer of my specific depicted projects.

Sincerely

Rickard Elofsson Rickard Elofsson (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images by Henk Smeets

Hello 0x0a, thank you once more for marking my last uploads of Images of Henk Smeets with "LicenseReview". But I asked myself, if it is really necessary to add this note in all the image descriptions of Henk Smeets' images, that the specified licence is ok. You can find all informations on the category page and I have added now an archive link to the permission page of Henk Smeets, too. What do you think? Greetings -- Ra'ike T C 12:55, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ra'ike Generally, a website's license notice is placed directly at the footer or on a separate copyright page linked via the footer, rather than hidden on an "About me" page. So when reviewers see a picture from "https://www.tomeikminerals.com/" that says "...all rights reserved.", they'll wonder if the uploader understands the copyright, does this picture really have a free license? To avoid this confusion, one can add a link to the copyright page to the "permission" field of the "Information" template. However, when you need to upload a large number of images from a site, it can be tedious to add such a link for each image. The best way to solve this problem is to create a dedicated license template to make it easy for reviewers to see copyright notices. For example: {{GreensAU}} for pictues from"https://greens.org.au/". 0x0a (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , thank you for your infos, but creating a template is a bit too tedious and time-consuming for me. That's why I've added the link to the ‘about me’ page and the corresponding archive link in the ‘permission’ parameter to all existing images.

From the pages of Henk Smeets only single pictures are uploaded so far, which are used for articles, although his pictures are all very valuable. So I can't say whether it will be worth creating a template in the future. Greetings -- Ra'ike T C 14:10, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominating

File:Ivo-Holanda-2021.png The following file was nominated for deletion. What can I do to prevent files I upload to Commons and share on Wikipedia from being marked for deletion? Like this one: File:Fábio Porchat at Lady Night by Humor Multishow.jpg. Could you help me about that? Ric Aries (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ric Aries: Please check the video page to see if there is a column that states "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)." If there is, the video can be accepted on Commons generally. --0x0a (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]